A full legal analysis of your GitHub repository's open-source license exposure, co-ownership risk, and GPL/AGPL contamination — delivered by a practicing lawyer in 2 business days.
GPL contamination, missing license headers, and undisclosed third-party dependencies are among the top deal-killers at technical due diligence. Most founders discover these issues only when a VC's legal counsel flags them — at the worst possible moment in a raise or acquisition process.
Open-source license compliance isn't just a legal formality. A single AGPL dependency in your core product can trigger a copyleft obligation that affects your entire codebase — and transforms a closed SaaS into a forced open-source disclosure.
This audit gives you a complete picture before anyone else has it — and a remediation roadmap so you can fix it before it costs you the deal.
Read-only access to your GitHub repository is sufficient. For public repos, no credentials are needed. For private repos, a temporary read-only token is sufficient and can be revoked after delivery.
Permissive licenses are much lower risk, but there are still notice requirements, attribution obligations, and patent clauses that matter at due diligence. The audit confirms you're actually compliant — not just that your license choice is theoretically safe.
Automated tools identify what's present. A lawyer tells you what it means, what your obligations are, and what happens if you get it wrong. I interpret the legal implications and give you a defensible legal analysis — not just a flag count.
Describe your repository and timeline. I'll reply within 48 hours with a fixed price and scope.
Order this report →